Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages
Date: 2000-02-21 23:57:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0002220023260.349-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 2000-02-20, Tom Lane mentioned:

> I would not like us to stop working
> with non-bison yaccs, since bison's output depends on alloca() which
> is not available everywhere.

Couldn't alloca(x) be defined to palloc(x) where missing? The performance
will be worse, but it ought to work.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-21 23:57:34 Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-'
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-21 23:57:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-22 03:56:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages
Previous Message Jeroen van Vianen 2000-02-21 09:07:11 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages