Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Date: 2000-02-13 21:43:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0002121844190.456-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-02-10, Tom Lane mentioned:

> 4. Fascist variant of #3: make LIMIT without ORDER BY be an error.

Got my vote for that. At least make it a notice: "NOTICE: LIMIT without
ORDER BY results in random data being returned" -- That'll teach 'em. ;)

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-13 23:11:36 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-13 19:19:30 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation