Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints
Date: 2000-01-27 22:28:16
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0001271935230.356-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-01-26, Don Baccus mentioned:

> If so, I thought Oliver pointed out that you had the numbering wrong.
> I thought so, too...

Someone made the good point that, independent of which numbering you might
prefer, using add column gives you a setup which you could not achieve
using only create table. That makes sense to me, so I'm withdrawing my
argument. ;)

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-27 22:28:24 Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-27 22:28:04 Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace