| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |
| Date: | 1999-12-11 02:00:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.20.9912110204140.1875-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1999-12-10, The Hermit Hacker mentioned:
> Damn damn damn...I can never explain these things right. The 7.x would,
> *at all times* maintain database compatibility with any 7.x release...I
> could cvsup down the newest source, build and install it, without any risk
> to my current databases...but still get access to a newer feature
In general, I like that concept, but I don't see that happening. With
every third patch "requiring initdb" you would potentially stall certain
areas of development indefinitely with your requirement. Unless we dream
up some way to dynamically adjust outdated system catalogues ...
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-12-11 02:01:09 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-12-11 02:00:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql |