Re: [HACKERS] GPL vs BSD licencing - a new twist

From: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "Pgsql-Hackers (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GPL vs BSD licencing - a new twist
Date: 1999-10-22 17:15:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9910221814160.28260-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Peter Mount wrote:
>
> > If you use cygwin1.dll in your application then your
> > application must be made available as open source. The way to avoid
> > this is to compile your program using the -mno-cygwin option.
>
> Out of curiousity, is cygwin open source?

Earlier today I found out that yes, cygwin is open source. However, they
have some similarities with Aladin where cygwin is used in embeded
applications as well.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryan Ingram 1999-10-22 20:21:42 postgres inode q's
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-22 17:15:09 Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1