| From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)tincan(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)townnews(dot)com>, Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) |
| Date: | 2001-06-28 17:50:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10106281046490.26107-100000@tincan.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyone have an idea about an automatic solution that wouldn't take any
> extra admin time? Maybe, when someone subscribes, automatically drop
> any pending messages from that person in the approval queue? That'd
> eliminate this kind of duplication, but I'm not sure what the downside
> might be, or how much work it'd be to set up. (For "drop" read "return
> to sender", anyway...)
If the list can be subscribed to bounce the message or drop in /dev/null
with a message they must be subscribed to the list.
Call it tough love!
Rod
--
Remove the word 'try' from your vocabulary ...
Don't try. Do it or don't do it ...
Steers try!
Don Aslett
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-28 18:00:03 | Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES) |
| Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2001-06-28 17:46:48 | Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |