From: | <kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Marten Feldtmann <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-02-07 06:15:34 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10002070004010.4446-100000@picasso.realtyideas.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
1) free is freedom, not free bear ;-) also, there are some sites
has oql draft -- like sql draft. sorry, can not remember.
2) good books, like " C++ object databases" (David Jordan) has
a lot material.
3) a lot of OODBM evaluation copy there. Not totally complied, but
together with 1 and 2, still can see what is going on.
so, no excuse for not knowing oodbm/oql :-) -- I'm waiting for
trying them on pg .
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >
> > > One very good point is the query language of the
> > > rdbms systems. On the odbms side no standard is
> > > really available, which can be seen as the sql of
> > > the odbms.
> >
> > There is a standard called OQL which is very similar to SQL. It's just
> > rather poorly supported.
> >
>
> I think the operative word here is "available". I know that SQL specs
> are'nt freely available either, but due to SQL being already widely
> supported one can get the general idea from many freely available sources,
> like the bunch of freely downloadable DB's currently available for linux.
> Most of them have some docs included.
>
> It is still quite a job to reconstruct SQL92 from them ;)
>
> I know now description (except a BNF syntax available from some ODBMS website)
> that I could use to get some idea about OQL.
>
> ----------------------
> Hannu
>
> ************
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthias Zehnder | 2000-02-07 10:38:47 | limits for a text field |
Previous Message | kaiq | 2000-02-07 05:18:22 | Re: [GENERAL] using ID as a key(REPOST) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-02-07 06:17:17 | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? |
Previous Message | Taral | 2000-02-07 06:12:47 | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marten Feldtmann | 2000-02-07 17:06:18 | Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-02-05 13:33:13 | Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |