| From: | Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron King <rking(at)aignetplex(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Is the fix for > 2GB files already in 6.5.3? |
| Date: | 2000-01-24 22:36:51 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10001242235450.4761-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Ron King wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I want to build a prototype system under 32-bit Linux using
> a table that would be about 20GB with PostgreSQL. I looked
> through the archives and saw talk about a patch for PostgreSQL
> to fix a bug with tables > 2Gb. If the system worked, I would
> like to migrate over to a 64-bit Alpha system and have tables
> > 40GB. Will it work?
>
> Is this patch incorporated into the latest release?
It should be as it went in before 6.5.3. The main fix was to break the
table files into 1Gb blocks.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manuel Cabido | 2000-01-24 22:59:25 | Re: pgsql-general-digest V1 #614 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-24 22:32:23 | Re: [GENERAL] Is the fix for > 2GB files already in 6.5.3? |