| From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Engelhart <aengelhart(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] CREATE LANGUAGE 'Java' |
| Date: | 1999-02-01 14:11:18 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9902011409020.3631-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Mike Engelhart wrote:
> Has anyone tried to use Java as an internal language for PostgreSQL? Is
> this a difficult task or even possible? Where would I start if it hasn't
> been done yet?
It hasn't been done yet, although about a month ago I did post a possible
way of allowing Java class files to be used as a languae for PostgreSQL.
You would need to use JNI and create a link between the backend(s) and a
running JVM. For performance reasons, I'd advise you have the JVM running
as a separate process to the backends.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-02-01 14:13:37 | Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? |
| Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1999-02-01 14:08:51 | Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? |