Re: [GENERAL] Problem with aggregates and group by

From: Memphisto <szoli(at)netvisor(dot)hu>
To: Ulf Mehlig <umehlig(at)uni-bremen(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL general mailinglist <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem with aggregates and group by
Date: 1998-10-30 17:13:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.981030180922.20039N-100000@linux.intranet.netvisor.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You are right. Thanks.
Perhaps originally I used a query that only used the annex_log table, but
this app I'm writing is generating the queries and there's also a query
that does the same job but FOR groups and there I shall use all the three
tables. I store the parts of the query string in C constant strings and
some parts of these two queries were in the same C strings. When I
elaborated the 'groups' query I modified these strings that's why I got
that very very strange query for 'users'.
Anyway thanks a lot.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebestyén Zoltán AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.
szoli(at)netvisor(dot)hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?

MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft Widows

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Meyer 1998-10-30 18:08:28 Transaction aborted?
Previous Message Ulf Mehlig 1998-10-30 16:47:31 Re: [GENERAL] Problem with aggregates and group by