From: | Memphisto <szoli(at)netvisor(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | Ulf Mehlig <umehlig(at)uni-bremen(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL general mailinglist <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Problem with aggregates and group by |
Date: | 1998-10-30 17:13:13 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.981030180922.20039N-100000@linux.intranet.netvisor.hu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
You are right. Thanks.
Perhaps originally I used a query that only used the annex_log table, but
this app I'm writing is generating the queries and there's also a query
that does the same job but FOR groups and there I shall use all the three
tables. I store the parts of the query string in C constant strings and
some parts of these two queries were in the same C strings. When I
elaborated the 'groups' query I modified these strings that's why I got
that very very strange query for 'users'.
Anyway thanks a lot.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebestyén Zoltán AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.
szoli(at)netvisor(dot)hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?
MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft Widows
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Meyer | 1998-10-30 18:08:28 | Transaction aborted? |
Previous Message | Ulf Mehlig | 1998-10-30 16:47:31 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem with aggregates and group by |