Re: [DOCS] Re: [INTERFACES] libpq & user

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces List <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: [INTERFACES] libpq & user
Date: 1998-07-16 18:09:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980716185647.1202T-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

[snip]

> If I generate a list of _all_ online document resources, and their
> current state (converted, unconverted, not a candidate for conversion,
> etc) would the hackers and docs people be willing to look at that when
> making changes? Seems like that should help coordinate things.

As I've said before, I'm working on the JDBC doc's. As there wasn't any
before, it shouldn't cause any problems.

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-16 18:11:12 Re: [DOCS] Re: [INTERFACES] libpq & user
Previous Message Jeffrey Napolitano 1998-07-16 17:53:20 "static" libraries?