| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |
| Date: | 2000-06-12 08:44:07 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000612103454.22148A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Applied to /contrib. If we don't need it with TOAST, we can remove or
> modify it.
>
Thanks. Well, it is good motivation for me --- I will continue on
development on this program.
IMHO we must support LO after TOAST implementation too. Some
large applications use LO and crossing to TOAST not will at once.
How idea is for LO in TOASTed PG --- will LO internal use TOAST
and as API current open/close/etc.? Or nothing will changed in LO?
Karel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2000-06-12 09:30:59 | Re: pg_shadow change |
| Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 2000-06-12 05:15:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hack to make postgres compile on Dec 4.0f with GCC |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2000-06-12 09:28:14 | Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE |
| Previous Message | Nick Gorham | 2000-06-12 05:58:19 | Re: odbc patches |