From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: day of week |
Date: | 2000-06-06 17:06:00 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000606180903.22225F-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Karel Zak writes:
>
> > The date_part() say that monday is a first day, to_char that it is
> > second day, and what will say date_trunc()? --- how date is a week
> > start, 'monday' or 'sunday' date ?
>
> In a perfect world, the answer would be locale dependent.
Hmm, I not sure with locale dependent --- if anyone use 'dow' in
some calculation he needs control over this number. For me is better
Tom's idea with SET.
> In many implementations Sunday is the first day of the week but counting
> starts with 0, so you still get Monday as "1".
All it is a little mazy, for example week-of-year:
Firts day of year:
=================
select to_char('2000-01-01'::timestamp, 'WW Day D');
to_char
----------------
00 Saturday 7 <----- '00' --- here I have bug
Oracle (8.0.5):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SVRMGR> select to_char( to_date('31-Dec-1999', 'DD-MON-YYYY'), 'WW Day D')
from dual;
TO_CHAR(TO_DAT
--------------
53 Friday 6
SVRMGR> select to_char( to_date('01-Jan-2000', 'DD-MON-YYYY'), 'WW Day D')
from dual;
TO_CHAR(TO_DAT
--------------
01 Saturday 7
The Oracle always directly set first week on Jan-01, but day-of-week count
correct... It is pretty dirty, but it is a probably set in libc's mktime().
Well, we will in PG both version:
oracle's to_char:
* week-start is a sunday
* first week start on Jan-01, but day-of-week is count continual
PG date_part/trunc:
* week-start in monday
* first week is a first full week in new year (really?)
Karel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-06-06 17:16:50 | Re: Odd release numbers for development versions? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-06 16:19:21 | Re: Odd release numbers for development versions? |