Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)

From: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)
Date: 2000-02-23 17:11:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1000223180302.15013F-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > I think so. The problem is that Node struct couldn't be freed safely
> > due to the lack of reference count in its definition. As far as I see
> > plans could be destroyed only when the memory context in which
> > they are placed are destroyed.
>
> This is overly conservative. It should be safe to destroy a plan tree
> via freeObject() if it was created via copyObject() --- and that is
> certainly how the plan would get into a permanent memory context.

Yes, SPI and my PREPARE use copyObject() for saving to TopMemoryContext.

Well, I believe you Tom that freeObject() is correct and I start
implement PlanCacheMemoryContext's routines for PREPARE (and
SPI's saveplan ?).

Karel Z.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-02-23 17:34:04 RE: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-23 17:08:14 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?