Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.

From: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Jose Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com>
Cc: PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.
Date: 2000-02-01 13:40:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1000201143134.23583A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Jose Soares wrote:

> I suppose do you refer to PostgreSQL date_part() function, while datepart() is a
> M$Access function.

Sorry, next time I read it better...

Hmm, datepart/date_part, it is very simular - IMHO any Micro$oft surely copy
this function from the best SQL - from PostgreSQL :-)

Karel

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arnaud FLORENT 2000-02-01 13:55:21 [GENERAL]
Previous Message Jose Soares 2000-02-01 13:21:46 Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.