From: | Peter Mount <peter(at)taer(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FW: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |
Date: | 1998-06-11 07:02:18 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.95.980611075916.22664J-100000@taer.maidstone.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998,
> >Bruce Momjian:
> >> PG_VERSION is now 6.4. initdb everyone. Or did we decide not to do
> >> this if we could help it. I think we will still need to run initdb,
> and
> >> move the data files.
> >
> >I had thought we were going to avoid changing this unless there were
> changes
> >to persistant structures. Do you know what changed to require this?
>
> Humm... I think:
>
> Even if catalogs would not be changed, initdb is required
> since we have added a new function octet_length().
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
With the bits I've claimed, were going to have even more functions, and a
new data type (large objects), so initdb is certain IMO.
--
Peter Mount, peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
Postgres email to peter(at)taer(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk & peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Remember, this is my work email, so please CC my home address, as I may
not always have time to reply from work.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jose' Soares Da Silva | 1998-06-11 10:15:56 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1998-06-11 03:19:40 | Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |