From: | Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? |
Date: | 1998-06-07 16:41:39 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.95.980607173948.2179A-100000@retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Morning all...
> >
> > Just curious, but what *is* planned for v6.4? We have a TODO
> > list, but I imagine there are things on that TODO list that ppl are
> > planning on for v6.4? Can we add a "planned for v6.4" to various items,
> > such that ppl have an idea of what they could be expecting? Even a
> > disclaimer at the top that states that altho "the following items are
> > planned for v6.4, time might not permit completion"?
> >
> > With that in mind, is anyone working on 'row level locking'? I
> > would think that, as far as importance is concerned, that would be one of
> > the most important features we are missing...
The bit's I'm working on for 6.4 (mostly Java/JDBC) are listed at
http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
>
> We do have in the TODO list:
>
> A dash(-) marks changes to be in the next release.
>
> and appears to be fairly accurate. Haven't hear much about people
> claiming items for 6.4 yet.
I should be down already for one of the large object bits
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-07 17:10:59 | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-06 21:32:33 | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? |