From: | Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)thelab(dot)hub(dot)org>, brandys(at)eng3(dot)hep(dot)uiuc(dot)edu, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff |
Date: | 1998-01-12 06:58:55 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.95.980112065558.19219A-100000@maidast |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, general question. Does pg_user need to be readable? Do
> non-postgres users want to see who owns each table? I don't know.
I'd say yes, as we have stuff in JDBC yet to implement that will access
this table.
--
Peter T Mount petermount(at)earthling(dot)net or pmount(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DBT | 1998-01-12 08:12:34 | = is not always defined as equality is bad |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-01-12 05:19:51 | Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff |