Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff

From: Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)thelab(dot)hub(dot)org>, brandys(at)eng3(dot)hep(dot)uiuc(dot)edu, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff
Date: 1998-01-12 06:58:55
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.95.980112065558.19219A-100000@maidast
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> OK, general question. Does pg_user need to be readable? Do
> non-postgres users want to see who owns each table? I don't know.

I'd say yes, as we have stuff in JDBC yet to implement that will access
this table.

--
Peter T Mount petermount(at)earthling(dot)net or pmount(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DBT 1998-01-12 08:12:34 = is not always defined as equality is bad
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-01-12 05:19:51 Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff