Re: [HACKERS] grant broken

From: Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] grant broken
Date: 1998-01-11 11:40:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.95.980111113947.7629A-100000@maidast
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> If I understood the test case you published, you are specifying to the grant
> command the database "test", not a table within the database. The man page for
> grant is not very specific, but is this supposed to work?

No, there is a table called test, that I'm granting permissions to. The
database is also called test.

Could grant be confusing the two?

--
Peter T Mount petermount(at)earthling(dot)net or pmount(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-11 12:46:44 Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 patches
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-01-11 06:10:27 Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 patches