From: | Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | holger(at)wizards(dot)de |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is WAL used for? |
Date: | 2003-12-01 21:01:11 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSU.4.44.0312011259320.11016-100000@eskimo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> WAL with ext3's data journaling is quite unnecessary because the WAL
> sort of IS the database's journal.
I believe you are mistaken. ext3 data journalling only does the
filesystem. It has no concept of the structure of the database itself.
WAL is still necessary to keep consistency on the table itself.
>
> Holger
> --
> A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
> Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2003-12-01 21:01:41 | Re: Storing passwords |
Previous Message | Ruth Hsieh | 2003-12-01 20:56:40 | pg_dump on one user not whole database |