Re: Pet Peeves

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Adam Rich <adam(dot)r(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves
Date: 2009-02-01 20:43:18
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0902011529100.4427@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Adam Rich wrote:

> - lack of queryable high-water marks useful for tuning

What specific things would you consider important to track a high-water
mark for that aren't already there?

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Jones 2009-02-02 05:15:49 Re: PGSQL or other DB?
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2009-02-01 20:39:06 Re: Full text index not being used