Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Which hardware ?

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: lionel(at)art-informatique(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which hardware ?
Date: 2008-06-17 15:32:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>> Which OS would you use ? (knowing that there will be a JDK 1.6 installed
>> too)
> . . .I think this is the real mistake.  Get a separate database box.
> It's approximately impossible to tune a box correctly for both your
> application and your database, in my experience.

I can't remember the last time I deployed a PG box that didn't have a Java 
app or three on it, too.  You've got even odds that putting it a separate 
system will even be a improvement.  Yes, if the Java app is a pig and the 
machine doesn't have enough resources, separating it out to another system 
will help.  But there are plenty of these buggers that will end up so much 
slower from the additional network latency that it's a net loss (depends 
on how the app groups its requests for rows).

If you know enough about Java to watch things like how much memory the 
JVMs are taking up, I wouldn't hesitate to put them all on the same 
machine.  Considering that Lionel's system seems pretty overpowered for 
what he's doing--runs plenty fast on a much slower system, enough RAM to 
hold a large portion of the primary tables and database, all batch updates 
that don't really need a good RAID setup--I'd say "looks good" here and 
recommend he just follow the plan he outlined.  Just watch the system with 
top for a bit under load to make sure the Java processes are staying under 

As for OS, a RHEL5 or clone like CentOS should work fine here, which is 
more appropriate depends on your support requirements.  I would recommend 
against using FreeBSD as it's not the friendliest Java platform, and the 
additional complexity of Solaris seems like overkill for your app. 
Basically, evem though it's available for more of them, I only consider 
deploying a Java app on one of the mainstream platforms listed at right now because those are the 
mature releases.

* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com Baltimore, MD

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2008-06-17 15:42:15
Subject: Re: Which hardware ?
Previous:From: LionelDate: 2008-06-17 14:49:17
Subject: Re: Which hardware ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group