Re: Benchmark Data requested

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark Data requested
Date: 2008-02-06 15:40:20
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0802061031440.15780@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Did you compare to COPY or \copy?

COPY. If you're loading a TB, if you're smart it's going onto the server
itself if it all possible and loading directly from there. Would probably
get a closer comparision against psql \copy, but recognize you're always
going to be compared against the best server-side copy method available.

> Do you want to test pgloader again with Marko psycopgwrapper code to see if
> this helps?

Wouldn't have time myself for at least a month (probably not until after
the East convention) so don't go making commits on my behalf.

> Maybe at the end of this PostgreSQL backend code will be smarter than pgloader
> (wrt error handling and data massaging) and we'll be able to drop the
> project

There are way too many data massaging cases I never expect the backend
will handle that pgloader does a great job of right now, and I think there
will always be a niche for a tool like this.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-02-06 15:56:03 Re: Benchmark Data requested --- pgloader CE design ideas
Previous Message Roberts, Jon 2008-02-06 15:35:47 Re: Optimizer : query rewrite and execution plan ?