Re: autovacuum: recommended?

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8(at)verizon(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum: recommended?
Date: 2007-11-19 17:22:57
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0711191220350.27759@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jean-David Beyer wrote:

> I am pretty sure they will never upgrade RHEL5 to the 8.2 series because
> they do not do it to get new features.

That's correct.

> I do know that if I try to use .rpms from other sources, I can get in a
> lot of trouble with incompatible libraries. And I cannot upgrade the
> libraries without damaging other programs.

You're also right that this is tricky. I've written a guide that goes
over the main issues involved at
http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/pgrpm.htm if you ever
wanted to explore this as an option.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Schumacher 2007-11-21 04:14:31 Postgres ignoring index when using left outer join.
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-19 17:18:59 Re: autovacuum: recommended?