| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: transactional DDL |
| Date: | 2007-08-15 19:10:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0708151506180.8319@westnet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
> What I would really love to see is an article on "PostgreSQL and Agile
> Development" where someone who knows AD talks about how our transactional DDL
> helps them to do AD.
Agile practices have such a strong focus on version control that I'm not
so sure how this would be compelling. If you're working in a proper AD
situation, you should be able to rebuild your schema and related code in a
working copy without caring about rollback if it doesn't work out.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-08-15 19:45:54 | Ohio Linuxfest Booth / Swag? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-08-15 17:26:47 | Re: transactional DDL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-08-15 19:13:18 | Re: Better spam filtering? |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-08-15 19:08:39 | Re: Printed Doc |