Re: Finally tsearch works ... somehow... remain a few

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Marcel Boscher <mboscher(at)emedia-office(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Finally tsearch works ... somehow... remain a few
Date: 2004-08-19 14:44:42
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.58.0408191839200.29483@ra.sai.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Marcel,

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Marcel Boscher wrote:

> For now i am almost statisfied with my tsearch2 installation war over night
> somehow it seems to work, finally...

what problems with installation ? Any additions,corrections to docs ?

>
> 3 probably easy questions remain...
> 1.) Is it possible to index already filled tables?

sure. It's written many times. Check to_tsvector() function

> 2.)Can i have seperated indexes for different columns in a table

why not, you may have separate indices or one index with different
weights assigned to each column (up tp 4 columns)

> 3.) Can i create an extra Table just for my indexes that is not included
> in my data table?

I don't understand this. Example, please.

Seems, you need to reread documentation.

http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/docs/tsearch-V2-intro.html
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/oddmuse/index.cgi/Tsearch_V2_Notes

>
> Greetings
> Marcel
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-19 14:44:57 Re: libpq: passwords WAS: scripting & psql issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-19 14:35:57 Re: Stored Procedures woes