Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...)

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...)
Date: 2004-03-26 16:00:53
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.58.0403261659190.12605@elvis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


> Possibly. The case that I thought was a real bad idea was actually the
> one in def_arg --- we don't want that doing any behind-the-scenes
> translation of words to other things. The ORDER BY case is just silly.

Ok. So the current code is silly, but the patch must be sound;-)

> > Or the rule factorization must be changed. It can also be done.
>
> Yes. I think we must have an all_subselect_ops or similar.

I'll do that and resubmit later.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-26 18:52:44 Re: installdir patch for win32
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-26 14:51:57 Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...)