On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > do we have anyone that is against using this? Steve seems to
> > indicate that this could be used for not just techdocs, but for the
> > other sites as well ... do we want to look at this too, since Oleg
> > seems to indicate the whole internationalization stuff shouldn't be
> > an issue using it?
> I read that he indicated that internationalization *is* an issue if you
> have lots of languages and frequent, irregular updates. To me, keeping
> the translations inline seems OK for a couple of languages and small
> sites, but for what we're talking about here it seems shortsighted.
You're right. The more I'm thinking about .postgresq.org sites, the more I
inclined to regular approach with Locale::Maketext::Lexicon.
http://www.autrijus.org/webl10n/webl10n.html - nice paper
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Justin Clift||Date: 2004-01-18 07:44:16|
|Subject: Entry for the front page?|
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2004-01-18 05:47:18|
|Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive|