Re: Bricolage: Impressive

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date: 2004-01-17 22:49:24
Message-ID: 200401172349.24222.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> do we have anyone that is against using this? Steve seems to
> indicate that this could be used for not just techdocs, but for the
> other sites as well ... do we want to look at this too, since Oleg
> seems to indicate the whole internationalization stuff shouldn't be
> an issue using it?

I read that he indicated that internationalization *is* an issue if you
have lots of languages and frequent, irregular updates. To me, keeping
the translations inline seems OK for a couple of languages and small
sites, but for what we're talking about here it seems shortsighted.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-17 22:56:34 Re: And now for an example of a different style of website
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-17 22:45:14 Re: What do we translate? How/When?