| From: | Tod McQuillin <devin(at)spamcop(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | R Talbot <rjtalbo(at)attglobal(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSql and Caldera |
| Date: | 2001-05-19 03:50:50 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.33.0105182246550.3446-100000@sysadmin |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 18 May 2001, R Talbot wrote:
> Why does there exist a binary rpm for Caldera eServer
> 2.3 but not for
> Caldera 2.3 edesktop or 2.4 edesktop. I want to install
> on edesktop.
> What are the differences and problems.
> I had read on the PostgreSQL site not to install eserver
> rpm on the
> edesktop,
> "as there are differences"
> I called Caldera Tech they say "I dunno..."
> I called GreatBridge and they say "I dunno.."
> Well I dunno either..
> I would greatly appreciate if someone would
> articulate.. ; > )
My philosophy is, if you have any doubt at all just compile from source.
It does take a little longer, but you're guaranteed to get the right
binary for your system at the end.
You can find step by step instructions at
http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?installation.html
--
Tod McQuillin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-19 03:54:47 | Re: Inserts using plpgsql - Further |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-19 03:37:51 | Re: Size of Postgres Transaction Logs |