| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: When malloc returns zero ... |
| Date: | 2000-05-02 08:50:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10005021047051.13753-100000@Iller.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Er, what's wrong with elog(DEBUG)?
Well, it says "DEBUG", not "ERROR", that's all. I'm using this in fact but
it's suboptimal.
> Doesn't the postmaster need to reread the config file itself in order to
> be sure to pass the new values to subsequently-started backends?
Good that you mention that ... :)
> Or is your plan that newly started backends will always parse the
> config file for themselves? In that case I'm not clear on why you
> care about the postmaster environment at all.
So you can set buffers, max backends, and that sort of static stuff. I
think that each backend reading the config file on startup is
unnecessarily slow.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | SAKAIDA | 2000-05-02 09:17:13 | Re: psql \l error |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-05-02 08:46:53 | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea |