| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |
| Date: | 2000-03-01 14:48:38 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10003011547240.25449-100000@Svan.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> TIME WITH
> TIMEZONE is currently transparently swallowed to become equivalent to
> TIME, for reasons spelled out in the docs. I've toyed with the idea of
> implementing the SQL92 version of it, but it is *so* useless and brain
> damaged (cf Date et al) that I (at least so far) cannot bring myself
> to do so. But if and when, it might be ztime internally.
I've read the documentation and SQL92 and I can't see anything wrong with
it. Care to enlighten me?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-03-01 15:03:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-03-01 14:47:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |