| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages |
| Date: | 2000-02-22 12:18:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002221316290.14754-100000@Haj.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> For the same sort of reasons I'd prefer that our scanner worked
> with vanilla lex, not just flex. I'm not sure how far away we are
> from that; it may be an unrealistic goal. But if it is within reach
> then we shouldn't give it up lightly.
I concur. Somewhere in between vanilla lex and flex is also POSIX lex,
which does support exclusive start conditions but no <<EOF>>.
Anyone for getting rid of GNU make?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-22 12:20:07 | Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager |
| Previous Message | sszabo | 2000-02-22 12:15:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-22 15:50:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-02-22 05:05:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages |