From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Lang <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Connection Pooling....an interesting question!! (was..Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help...) |
Date: | 2000-12-16 17:28:17 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001216202451.21815C-100000@ra |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Adam Lang wrote:
> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:07:16 -0500
> From: Adam Lang <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
> To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connection Pooling....an interesting question!! (was..Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help...)
>
> As (I believe) Joel mentioned, you should use a distributed architecture.
> Clients shouldn't directly access your db server. I believe it is
> "acceptable" if you are only looking at a small app that 10 people are going
> to use, but 200 hundred clients is a lot.
>
> You should have postgres on one tier, your clients on one, and devise a
> middle tier that acts as a relay between your clients and postgres. That
> way the 200 connections are not handled by postgres. Postgres will only
> need to handle the 10 or so you pool with the middle tier.
Brrr, we have 128 persistent connections without any problem.
Just use -N option. I dont' remember maximum number of backends compiled
on default, but you could always change this number.
But you're right whe you speaking about 3-tire model. We're experimenting
with Corba and preliminary results are promising
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Lang | 2000-12-16 17:36:06 | Re: Connection Pooling....an interesting question!! (was..Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help...) |
Previous Message | Adam Lang | 2000-12-16 17:07:16 | Re: Connection Pooling....an interesting question!! (was..Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help...) |