Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)csd(dot)uu(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
Date: 1999-10-19 16:34:32
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.3.96.991019182852.24574B-100000@enequist.csd.uu.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Huh? We certainly do --- or have you missed that
> * Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
> that's plastered across all the source files?

Regarding which I have a question: at other locations I see (c) 1994-7
Univ. of California, or even (c) 1996-9 PostgreSQL Global Development
Team.

I am not an expert in any of this, but I'm just wondering: when did the
involvement of the U of C end, when was the Global Development Team (tm)
formed and do both copyrights exits in parallel? What if someone
contributes something really major and fairly independent (say like
pg_access) and wants to keep his own copyright (with compatible license of
course)?

And is the PostgreSQL Global Development Team any real entity that could
theoretically enforce that copyright or is it just an alias for "whoever
contributed"?

-Peter

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-10-19 16:39:35 Re: Need refresh on main page...
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-19 16:27:51 Re: Need refresh on main page...