Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch adding new regexp functions

From: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Date: 2007-02-11 00:08:33
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0702101605450.28908@resin.csoft.net (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
I noticed in the documentation that you added indexterms for the
functions, but that they (along with the existing ones) are in the SIMILAR
TO regular expression section.  These functions do not take SIMILAR TO
regular expressions, but POSIX regular expressions, so I moved them to
that section in this patch, and also moved the regexp_replace indexterm
there also, since it also uses POSIX regular expressions.

-- 
10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.

Attachment: regexp-split-matches-documented_new-7.patch
Description: text/plain (48.1 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Benjamin AraiDate: 2007-02-11 00:56:21
Subject: Priorities for users or queries?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-02-10 22:25:43
Subject: Re: XML export

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2007-02-11 15:16:04
Subject: Re: patch for ECPG (BUG #2956: ECPG does not treat multibyte characters correctly.)
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-02-10 09:30:31
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] How can I use 2GB of shared buffers on Windows?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group