Re: patch adding new regexp functions

From: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Date: 2007-02-11 00:08:33
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0702101605450.28908@resin.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

I noticed in the documentation that you added indexterms for the
functions, but that they (along with the existing ones) are in the SIMILAR
TO regular expression section. These functions do not take SIMILAR TO
regular expressions, but POSIX regular expressions, so I moved them to
that section in this patch, and also moved the regexp_replace indexterm
there also, since it also uses POSIX regular expressions.

--
10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.

Attachment Content-Type Size
regexp-split-matches-documented_new-7.patch text/plain 48.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benjamin Arai 2007-02-11 00:56:21 Priorities for users or queries?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-02-10 22:25:43 Re: XML export

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2007-02-11 15:16:04 Re: patch for ECPG (BUG #2956: ECPG does not treat multibyte characters correctly.)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-02-10 09:30:31 Re: [PATCHES] How can I use 2GB of shared buffers on Windows?