Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions

From: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions
Date: 2007-02-07 08:26:00
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0702070010470.28908@resin.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, David Fetter wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:01:33PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
>
> > Let me know if you see any bugs or issues with this code, and I am
> > open to suggestions for further regression tests ;)

I have not heard anything, so I guess at this point I should figure out
where to go next with this. I see a couple options:

* Set this up as a pgfoundry project or contrib. This would require
merging the patch to expose some functions from regexp.c outside that
file, which has raised some concerns about maintainability.

* Put together a patch to add these functions to core. I could put them
directly in regexp.c, so the support functions could stay static. My
concern here is that I don't know if there are any functions currently
in core with OUT parameters. I don't know the acceptable style for
handling this: OUT parameters, a named composite type, ...?

Does anyone have any opinions either way, as to how I should proceed
from here?

> > * maybe a join function that works as an aggregate
> > SELECT join(',', col) FROM tbl
> > currently can be written as
> > SELECT array_to_string(ARRAY(SELECT col FROM tbl), ',')
>
> The array_accum() aggregate in the docs works OK for this purpose.

I have decided not to pursue this function, I think the array construct,
or the array_accum option, is about the best possible currently. If it
should become possible in the future to write aggregates with a non-sql
state type (structs with pointers) it may be worthwhile to re-evaluate
this.

--
The cost of living hasn't affected its popularity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2007-02-07 08:45:08 Re: Proposal: TABLE functions
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-02-07 07:37:59 Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-07 08:28:12 Fast CLUSTER
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-02-07 07:27:13 Re: Feature: POSIX Shared memory support