| From: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests |
| Date: | 2006-09-25 23:16:37 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0609251611210.16532@resin.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote:
>
> It looks like the large_obj.c output is missing much of the output
> settings handling which is in the PrintQueryStatus function in common.c,
> such as handling quiet mode, and html output. I will try to dig around
> and try to put together a patch to make it respect the settings like other
> commands...
I put together a patch for psql's large_obj.c to make it respect the
output settings. Is this reasonable?
--
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat,
and wrong.
-- H. L. Mencken
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| psql-largeobj-output.patch | text/plain | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-25 23:20:22 | Re: Questions about guc units |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-25 23:14:24 | Re: Windows build farm failures |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-25 23:20:22 | Re: Questions about guc units |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-09-25 22:19:19 | Re: [PATCHES] large object regression tests |