Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Tea Yu <teayu1(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC executeUpdate returns 0 for table partitioning rule
Date: 2005-12-06 15:47:46
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.61.0512061045400.5324@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Tea Yu wrote:

> The scenario is quite simple - insert into a partitioned table in which a
> rule forwards the insertion into an inherited partition (Postgresql 8.1)
>
> However, JDBC returns 0 during Statement.executeUpdate(sql). It behaves
> normally when partition rule is removed.

That's certainly not what I'm seeing here. I've attached my testcase. So
I've shown you mine, now you show me yours.

Kris Jurka

Attachment Content-Type Size
Rule.java text/plain 625 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message marcus 2005-12-06 15:56:07 В аренду офисы 300-28000 класса «В+»
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2005-12-06 15:37:45 Re: Problem with 8.1 driver