| From: | bpalmer <bpalmer(at)crimelabs(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Vande More <dvm(at)firstlink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mirrors that don't suck. |
| Date: | 2003-12-24 00:49:01 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.58.0312231946380.6611@psidion.crimelabs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Hey list, I'm just wondering if anyone can point me in the direction of a mirror that doesn't suck.
At least in the US, I think I should be pretty decent
(ftp3.us.postgresql.org). I've rate limited down to 6M/s but that should
be enough for anyone. I rsync every 4 hours. If anyone can't get to the
site of it's slow, please complain to me, I would love to know.
- Brandon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
c: 917-697-8665 h: 201-435-6226
b. palmer, bpalmer(at)crimelabs(dot)net pgp:crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ezra epstein | 2003-12-24 02:06:08 | SELECT INTO broken (?) in PL/pgSQL when using a set returning function in FROM clause (BGUG?) |
| Previous Message | DeJuan Jackson | 2003-12-24 00:41:39 | Re: bug in query planning? |