| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nicolai Petri (lists)" <lists(at)petri(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-04-30 10:05:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.56.0504300500520.29873@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> We also use PostgreSQL as our primary db so it would be more than likely
> that we would donate money for something similar with postgresql if
> either :
> a) we can direct the money at one or more specific tasks
> or
> b) the tasks founded will be related to core postgresql features e.g.
> generel performance or other benefits that fits all.
>
The problem is organization. Who decides who gets what money? What about
features that are paid for and worked on and not accepted into the
community codebase? This was something I hoped the PostgreSQL Foundation
http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/ would step in and do, but we seem much
more focused on advocacy efforts rather than developemnt ones.
Kris Jurka
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Butler | 2005-04-30 12:54:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Nicolai Petri (lists) | 2005-04-30 08:37:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-30 11:26:33 | Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream |
| Previous Message | Nicolai Petri (lists) | 2005-04-30 08:37:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |