On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Xavier Poinsard wrote:
> I read in the code that the Uninmplemented exception was designed to
> reduce driver size, but would you consider a patch adding the name of
> the unimplemented function to the message ?
I don't know, it doesn't seem all that useful. Anyone doing real
development will surely know what function they are calling and will have
the stacktrace handy. If we find out that Crystal Reports or other
applications only return the error message with no context then we should
probably do something about it. For now I believe time would be better
spent actually implementing these methods.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: NielsG||Date: 2005-02-10 09:44:59|
|Subject: Possible Bug with JDBC 8.0-310 JDBC 3|
|Previous:||From: Xavier Poinsard||Date: 2005-02-10 09:00:32|
|Subject: Re: Crystal Reports / PostgreSQL|