On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > Well, no one seems to have any better ideas, how about a better place for
> > the infinity constants. org.postgresql.jdbc2.TimestampUtils is not a
> > public interface. PGStatement?
> I vote for PGStatement :-)
I was getting ready to apply this patch when I decided to add a couple
more tests and I'm getting a failure for getDate() that I do not have time
at the momemnt to investigate. Could you take a look at the attached
patch and see what's going on.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2005-01-25 08:54:13|
|Subject: Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?|
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2005-01-25 07:27:17|
|Subject: Re: Patch to implement Connection.nativeSQL|