| From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: selecting from cursor |
| Date: | 2001-07-03 02:32:01 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10107022231060.7004-200000@spider.pilosoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Erm, forgot to attach the patch. Here it is.
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> They just have things declared as RangeTblEntry *, and as long as they
> don't access type-specific fields, they are fine.
>
> > shown us the proposed changes, I really suspect that a union would be
> > cleaner, because it'd avoid ugliness in those places. Bear in mind that
> I have attached the diff of what I have now. Please take a look through
> it. Its not exactly done (only the parser and pieces of executor parts of
> "FROM CURSOR" are there, and I didn't attach gram.y diff because its just
> too ugly now), so its definitely not ready for application, but with these
> changes, it compiles and 'make check' goes through fine ;)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| back.diff | text/plain | 66.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-07-03 03:27:58 | Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug |
| Previous Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-07-03 02:30:50 | Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier |