| From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sun performance - Major discovery! |
| Date: | 2003-10-08 14:57:34 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.44.0310081057090.63351-100000@torgo.978.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> My worry about this test is that it gives us precious little
> knowledge about concurrent connection slowness, which is where I find
> the most significant problems. When we tried a Sunsoft cc vs gcc 2.95
> on Sol 7 about 1 1/2 years ago, we found more or less no difference
> once we added more than 5 connections (and we always have more than 5
> connections). It might be worth trying again, though, since we moved
> to Sol 8.
>
The 20x column are the results when I fired up 20 beater concurrently.
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff | 2003-10-08 15:00:30 | Re: Sun performance - Major discovery! |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-08 14:57:31 | Re: Disabling function validation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff | 2003-10-08 15:00:30 | Re: Sun performance - Major discovery! |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-10-08 14:54:24 | Re: Speeding up Aggregates |