| From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | pg-perform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
| Date: | 2003-10-07 15:40:01 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.44.0310071139080.57915-100000@torgo.978.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Stef wrote:
> The initial instance took up 8372K and this fluctuated
> between +- 8372K and 10372K, plus +- 3500K for
> every connection.
>
Does that include/exlude the size of say, shared code & libraries?
I know linux does copy-on-write forking.. so it may be less in reality...
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-07 16:51:21 | Re: some question about column constraints |
| Previous Message | Stef | 2003-10-07 15:28:22 | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Timothy D. Witham | 2003-10-07 18:34:33 | Re: TPC-R benchmarks |
| Previous Message | Stef | 2003-10-07 15:28:22 | Re: Postgres low end processing. |