Re: ILIKE

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ILIKE
Date: 2003-02-24 15:13:06
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0302241012380.49095-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Justin Clift wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> >>My feeling too. Whatever you may think of its usefulness, it's been a
> >>documented feature since 7.1. It's a bit late to reconsider.
> >
> > It's never too late for new users to reconsider. It's also never too late
> > to change your application of performance is not satisfactory.
> >
>
> Well, ILIKE has been a feature for quite some time and the amount of
> negative feedback we've been receiving about upgrade problems makes me
> feel that _removing_ it would be detrimental. (i.e. broken applications)
>
> As an alternative to _removing_ it, would a feasible idea be to
> transparently alias it to something else, say a specific type of regex
> query or something?

Why screw with it for the sake of screwing with it?

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

  • Re: ILIKE at 2003-02-24 14:39:20 from Justin Clift

Responses

  • Re: ILIKE at 2003-02-24 15:24:05 from Tom Lane
  • Re: ILIKE at 2003-02-24 15:29:01 from Justin Clift

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-24 15:24:05 Re: ILIKE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-24 15:02:15 Re: REPEATED INSERT INTO ...