Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-www-main(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development
Date: 2002-12-09 12:51:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote:

> >
> > > Having one machine that can access the database and build
> > the pages,
> > > and another to serve them is 'redundancy' how exactly?
> >
> > One machine fails, the other can pick it up.  It also makes
> > it possible for folks to work on it and check out the end
> > product without it going live.
> For real redundancy, both machines must perform the build and serve the
> pages. I think keeping it on both machines will just add to the
> complexity for little gain.
> You're the webmaster though - just let me know what you want to do...

Where exactly are the static pages?

 Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond!
         Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-12-09 13:03:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-12-09 12:48:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group