Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-www-main(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces
Date: 2002-12-09 12:48:04
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128D2D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 09 December 2002 12:41
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www-main(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www-main] [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL
> Global Development Group Announces
>
> > Having one machine that can access the database and build
> the pages,
> > and another to serve them is 'redundancy' how exactly?
>
> One machine fails, the other can pick it up. It also makes
> it possible for folks to work on it and check out the end
> product without it going live.

For real redundancy, both machines must perform the build and serve the
pages. I think keeping it on both machines will just add to the
complexity for little gain.

You're the webmaster though - just let me know what you want to do...

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-12-09 12:51:22 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-12-09 12:41:02 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces