Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] HP Unix 11.00 Compiler error.

From: Chris Bowlby <excalibur(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HP Unix 11.00 Compiler error.
Date: 2001-05-24 19:33:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

Great, I'll pass this on thanks.

> Chris Bowlby <excalibur(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > The configure script errors out looking
> > for _eprintf(), which apparently is a now deprecated GCC
> > attempt at a compatibility layer. This tells me I really
> > can't use the binary build made by the HP-UX porting archive
> > folks.
> FWIW, I've seen eprintf link failures on HPUX 10.20 as well.  I think
> the key to avoiding it is that you have to build all the components with
> the same compiler (all gcc, or all HP's).  If you want to link against a
> precompiled ssl library then that will determine your choice of compiler.
> > Cannot compile PostgreSQL and C++ library (--with-CXX) with GCC.
> > Can't find <string> class in STL. Suspect packaging
> > job done by HP-UX porting archive: it moves GCC from
> > /usr/local to /opt, and a few things didn't make the
> > trip smoothly.
> I agree.  I don't have any trouble building the C++ library here,
> using either hand-built gcc or HP's cc.  I let gcc install itself
> in the usual place, ie, /usr/local.
> The Porting Archive guys do good work, but their stuff gives headaches
> if you want to mix and match it with stuff you build yourself.  They're
> way too eager to mess around with install locations.
> I'd recommend rebuilding gcc in a vanilla configuration, using the
> porting archive gcc just for bootstrap purposes.
> 			regards, tom lane

 Chris Bowlby,
 Web Developer @

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-05-24 20:05:44
Subject: Re: Smaller access privilege changes
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-24 19:17:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HP Unix 11.00 Compiler error.

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ivan LikhachovDate: 2001-05-24 19:45:18
Subject: FullText in postgres
Previous:From: Thalis A. KalfigopoulosDate: 2001-05-24 19:22:59
Subject: array bad behavior?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group